I DO NOT ACCEPT TROLLS, BUT I DO ACCEPT…

Comparative Reasoning
3 min readFeb 11, 2019

--

Stupid people are stupid. That is what I accept. From this day forward, until something crazy crosses my path of rationality, I refuse to deal in the “Troll” arena. I urge all rational people to do the same. I saw a reply on the David Pakman YouTube comment section and it was a decent retort. He said he wanted to run for office, but with so much corruption, he doesn’t want to waste his time. That made me smile and boost him. I cited that the fact that he doesn’t like corruption is the main reason why he NEEDS to run. What was so bad about that? Some idiot chose to claim I used the wrong “to” and said it needs to be “too”. I cited him as a troll, told him it was fail, and gave a perfect reason on why. He was not happy and said some stupid things. I’ll be honest: Trolls bore the shit out of me. I get bored dealing with them. They are unintelligent wastes of characters and breathe (for non-digital conversations). I blocked him because I didn’t care to hear the chimes of stupidity each time he made a stupid reply. After that, his friend chimed in asking why I can’t simply accept “too” and such. I gave a retort and blocked him. Then another guy popped up asserting people like me, resort to insults instead of debating. I gave him a great reason, exploited his stupidity, and he cited that I made it easy for him and next time, I need not make it so easy. I told him I’d always make it easy to prove his point, because I refuse to use the wrong version of “too” or “to” unless it is a typo. I blocked him as well.

At this rate, I’ll block 90% of YouTube because as it stands in observation, I attract dumbasses, and I’m far from that. I didn’t use “Comparative Reasoning” because I don’t think. I didn’t use it because I enjoy asserting information and straw-manning people. So from this day forward, until something crazy crosses my path, I will cite trolls as simply stupid people. What’s my definition of stupid?

STUPID: Mannerisms in direct opposition of the wisdom known and, or taught in regards to decency.

In simpler terms, “Knowing better and refusing to act accordingly.”

These people know better and refuse to act like it. Therefore, they’re stupid.

On their behavior, they are either lying, or stupid. Which one do you think they’d choose? I promise they’ll attack you because they are cornered. If you are a troll, you’re stupid. If you enjoy trolling, you’re stupid. I had thick skin, now I have a STANDARD. Standards are more important that allowing people to insult you because THEY find it funny. If anything, Trolls are to be used for views, and such, and nothing else. They are not worth the time, energy, or integrity.

Please let me know how you feel about trolls? If you find what I said offensive because you are a troll, or have trolled, then it is not I with the issue. It is you. What do you want the world to see of you? Your best or your worst at it best?

--

--

Comparative Reasoning
Comparative Reasoning

Written by Comparative Reasoning

A catch-all topic based channel without restraint. I’m about shedding light through the fog using compare & contrast, mixed with reasoning, and personal views.

Responses (1)